• Year
  • 1970 ??
  • Category
  • Kit (Parts plus instruction) or building instructions only
  • Radiomuseum.org ID
  • 138644
    • Brand: DeVry

Click on the schematic thumbnail to request the schematic as a free document.

 Technical Specifications

  • Number of Tubes
  • 9
  • Power type and voltage
  • Alternating Current supply (AC) / 110 Volt
  • Material
  • Metal case
  • from Radiomuseum.org
  • Model: Oscilloscope 34 - Bell & Howell, Wheeling
  • Shape
  • Tablemodel, low profile (big size).
  • Dimensions (WHD)
  • 310 x 200 x 425 mm / 12.2 x 7.9 x 16.7 inch
  • Notes
  • Endgerät eines Elektoniklehrgangs der Firma Bell & Howell Schools
  • Net weight (2.2 lb = 1 kg)
  • 8.7 kg / 19 lb 2.6 oz (19.163 lb)
  • Source of data
  • - - Manufacturers Literature
  • Author
  • Model page created by Karlheinz Gützlaff. See "Data change" for further contributors.

 Collections | Museums | Literature

Collections

The model Oscilloscope is part of the collections of the following members.

 Forum

Forum contributions about this model: Bell & Howell,: Oscilloscope 34

Threads: 1 | Posts: 2

There are two schematics on the page for the Bell & Howell (DeVry Institute) Oscilloscope model 34. It would appear there are likely two variations of this 'scope as the one I have has a different tube 6AF11 than any of the tubes shown in the first schematic. The second yellowed schematic is just a thumbnail and does not show clearly at all when downloaded.

I'm hoping that Karlheinz Gutzlaff has a better copy he can upload as the second schematic appears to match my machine.

What I am surprised about is there is NO fuse in this unit! What were they thinking! I am using a line fuse of 3/4A slo-blow for 120VAC operation.

This is similar to the Heathkit Laboratory 5" Oscilloscope model IO-12. I don't have any other Heathkit 'scope schematics and I saw on an old posting somewhere else that the person thought Heathkit was the source for DeVry Institute stuff. And I understand that Heathkit stuff was designed by some other company whose name I have forgotten - but I could be wrong.

Thanks!

John Robertson, 25.Mar.20

Weitere Posts (2) zu diesem Thema.