• Year
  • 1941/1942
  • Category
  • Broadcast Receiver - or past WW2 Tuner
  • Radiomuseum.org ID
  • 179534
    • alternative name: CMC Canada || Marconi, Canada

Click on the schematic thumbnail to request the schematic as a free document.

 Technical Specifications

  • Number of Tubes
  • 5
  • Main principle
  • Superheterodyne (common); ZF/IF 462.5 kHz
  • Tuned circuits
  • 6 AM circuit(s)
  • Wave bands
  • Broadcast only (MW).
  • Power type and voltage
  • Alternating Current supply (AC) / 115 Volt
  • Loudspeaker
  • Electro Magnetic Dynamic LS (moving-coil with field excitation coil)
  • Power out
  • 56 W (unknown quality)
  • Material
  • Wooden case
  • from Radiomuseum.org
  • Model: 200E - Canadian Marconi Co. Ltd. CMC,
  • Shape
  • Tablemodel without push buttons, Mantel/Midget/Compact up to 14
  • Dimensions (WHD)
  • 14 x 9 x 7 inch / 356 x 229 x 178 mm
  • Author
  • Model page created by Christian Walter. See "Data change" for further contributors.

 Collections | Museums | Literature

Collections

The model 200E is part of the collections of the following members.

 Forum

Forum contributions about this model: Canadian Marconi Co.: 200E

Threads: 1 | Posts: 2

Greetings!

I have a 1942 Marconi 200E with a RF alignemnt issue that I cannot resolve. The radio was bought thru a vendor that did the usual electrical restoration.

The alignment seems to be off by about 100kc on the dial scale. 

The skematic instructions say to adjust the OSC trim to 1700kc, and the RF trim to 1600kc. Doing this seems to align station on the high end, but mis-alignes on the low end of the scale..... I need to tune to 710 to actual hear a 800kc station. 

The opposite is also true, alignment on the low end will mis-align on the high end.... 1280kc ends up at 1400kc.

This radio has no padder the helps fine tune the low end, my RCA has this thankfully.

Is there any way to resolve this? Is it an inherantly poorly designed radio circuit or is there something else that I should be looking at?

See that attachment for the circuit skematic.

Thank you for any and all suggestions! Keep in mind that I am not an expert in any way ;-)

 

Antonio.

 

 

Attachments

Antonio Maltese, 01.Mar.20

Weitere Posts (2) zu diesem Thema.