Diode "2.5 Raytheon"?

ID: 205780
? Diode "2.5 Raytheon"? 
21.Nov.09 17:36
68

Götz Linss † 27.06.21 (D)
Articles: 277
Count of Thanks: 10

Hello,

when working on the Sterling models in RM I came across some power supply schematics - see Rider's Vol.3, page Sterling 3-4. Some of these power supplies contain rectifier devices without heaters, labelled ?? Raytheon. Model R-96 (schematic included) shows a 2.5 Raytheon. Can someone shed more light on this and other similar devices?

Greetings Goetz Linss

 

Attachments:

To thank the Author because you find the post helpful or well done.

 2
Raytheon 'A' rectifier 
22.Nov.09 10:29
68 von 5338

Nikolaus Löwe (D)
Articles: 221
Count of Thanks: 8
Nikolaus Löwe

Raytheon was known to me as a maker of gaseous rectifiers for "B" power supplies. The posted schematic clearly shows a power supply designed to charge batteries. After a little internet research I found information on the Raytheon "A" rectifier in the August 1927 issue of "Radio News". It´s a cold, apparently electrolytic rectifier cell for low voltages and high currents, designed for battery charging. Maximum reverse voltage is 22V, maximum operating current around 2A. An example of a commercial battery charger using these elements is given, made by the National Co.

Maybe this is the element shown in model R-96.

Yours,

Nikolaus Löwe

Attachments:

To thank the Author because you find the post helpful or well done.

 3
Raytheon rectifier 
23.Nov.09 17:20
246 von 5338

Götz Linss † 27.06.21 (D)
Articles: 277
Count of Thanks: 8

Found on the Internet - not quite the "2.5 Raytheon" of my original question. The rectifier described in this PDF document (source Radio News, October 1926) is used in the Sterling R-81.

G.Linss

 

Ein spezieller Dank an Herrn Günzel für die Aufbereitung der PDF Datei. Für deutschsprachige Leser ist eine Beschreibung unter  http://www.radiomuseum.org/forum/g132_glimmgleichrichter_roehre.html (ebenfalls von Herrn Günzel fürs RM bearbeitet) zu finden.

Attachments:

To thank the Author because you find the post helpful or well done.