telefunken: 2194; Concertino -- UKW not working |
James MacWilliams Schem.: 0 Pict.: 8 07.Jul.09 22:33 Count of Thanks: 9 |
Reply | You aren't logged in. (Guest) 1
I am restoring a Telefunken Concertino 2194. I have replaced all the paper capacitors and a couple of resistors that were out of tolerance. The radio works well on all the AM bands - LW, MW, and KW -- and sounds great. FM (or UKW), however, is not working. It does receive one station, extremely weak, volume has to be at maximum to hear it. This station is just outside the FM band the radio should receive -- 101.0 MHz. All the voltages are okay. I have checked the waveband keyboard switches and they are okay. I have tried known good tubes (valves) -- ECC85, EF89 (2x), ECH81, and EABC80 with no change. I have made some DC resistance checks through the FM front end section with the ECC85 removed to verify the resistors. They are okay with the exception of W604 which should be 33k and I measure 21k. But I am not sure how to open the front end section, so nothing has been changed (or cleaned for that matter). I am hoping for some suggestions on where to procede. Or perhaps notes on how to open and service the FM front end. Has anyone had similar problems with this model? Any guidance would be appreciated. Regards, Jim |
Hans M. Knoll ![]()
Editor
D Articles: 2138 Schem.: 159 Pict.: 102 08.Jul.09 17:03 Count of Thanks: 9 |
Reply | You aren't logged in. (Guest) 2
Hello Jim. If you want,read here. Maybe a solution for parts of your problem. post # 4,8,10,12,14,16, and 18. 8 is important.
hans m. knoll
This article was edited 08.Jul.09 17:12 by Hans M. Knoll . |
James MacWilliams Schem.: 0 Pict.: 8 08.Jul.09 17:36 Count of Thanks: 22 |
Reply | You aren't logged in. (Guest) 3
Thanks Hans. That link will be a big help. First, I now know how to open the RF section. Second, it gives lots of help in understanding how it works and what is important. Much appreciated. Jim |
Hans M. Knoll ![]()
Editor
D Articles: 2138 Schem.: 159 Pict.: 102 08.Jul.09 17:47 Count of Thanks: 6 |
Reply | You aren't logged in. (Guest) 4
Hello Jim
Important is: the cores inside the FM-Box being moved via Dial? Post 8, Local Osc. works ? Without this, no reception is doing. Your Signal at 101 can bee something e.g. Overloading the RF- Stage. hans |
James MacWilliams Schem.: 0 Pict.: 8 08.Jul.09 21:51 Count of Thanks: 7 |
Reply | You aren't logged in. (Guest) 5
Hi Hans, With the information in the thread you provided I was able to remove and open the FM front end. The good news: the cores are okay and moving properly. So far I have been able to only inspect the unit. Everything looks okay. I did test the diode. It is okay. The resistor I was concerned about is really a 22k resistor. The schematic shows a 33k resistor there. Perhaps this resistor (W604, the bias resistor for the anode of the oscillator) is selected during manufacturing. Based on your explanation in the other thread, I suspect the oscillator is not working and the radio station I hear is due to the mixing of two stations. The schematic shows that both the RF amplifier and the oscillator should draw 12.7 mA. I will verify that. The schematic also shows a switch S7 that is part of the FM tuning knob. What is the function of this? Jim |
James MacWilliams Schem.: 0 Pict.: 8 08.Jul.09 22:06 Count of Thanks: 6 |
Reply | You aren't logged in. (Guest) 6
Hans, I read further in the other thread and now realize that S7 must be part of the AFC circuit. But I'm still uncertain what it does? |
Hans M. Knoll ![]()
Editor
D Articles: 2138 Schem.: 159 Pict.: 102 08.Jul.09 22:58 Count of Thanks: 10 |
Reply | You aren't logged in. (Guest) 7
Hello Jim. You must go to post 8 an realise the Measuments DC- Volt on Testpoint on FM-Box or this test
If you not understand what's do to? Let me now. It's abolute important. hans Attachments:
This article was edited 09.Jul.09 10:00 by Hans M. Knoll . |
James MacWilliams Schem.: 0 Pict.: 8 09.Jul.09 16:00 Count of Thanks: 6 |
Reply | You aren't logged in. (Guest) 8
I will try these tests this evening. Thanks for the help. Jim |
James MacWilliams Schem.: 0 Pict.: 8 09.Jul.09 18:39 Count of Thanks: 5 |
Reply | You aren't logged in. (Guest) 9
Hans, I performed the test you requested. At the test point I measure -3.3 vdc. Looking at the signal on the test point with an oscilloscope, I see a sine wave from 0.0 vdc to -5.6 vdc at 11.02 MHz. I think this is okay? Any thoughts? Jim |
Hans M. Knoll ![]()
Editor
D Articles: 2138 Schem.: 159 Pict.: 102 09.Jul.09 19:38 Count of Thanks: 7 |
Reply | You aren't logged in. (Guest) 10
Hello Jim.
I will say, nothing is allright.
There is not any reason for 10 + / - Mcs on testpoint
If that is right, oscillate the stage (mixer_osc) on IF = 10,7 Mcs not aproxx 100Mcs.
Also then you can measures, negative voltage by the Test point, it works like a BC (MW_LW) Osc. together with the IF-Coils
Three ideas.
Solder 150 to 220 pF in parallel to C616 130 pF
Or, an 3300 to 3900 pF in parallel to C610 3300 pF
Or break Resistor W602 on one end. This stops RF- Stage. Maybe she oscillate on RF Frequency and overload the Mixer_Osc.
And repeat the measurments again, each.
See Diagram
![]()
Hans
This article was edited 09.Jul.09 19:57 by Hans M. Knoll . |
James MacWilliams Schem.: 0 Pict.: 8 09.Jul.09 22:44 Count of Thanks: 6 |
Reply | You aren't logged in. (Guest) 11
Per your request, here is what I measured:
All of these tests were done with the RF box removed from the chassis. RF box assembly is open. Jumper wires are used to connect HT (170 vdc), 6.3 vac, and earth (ground). Any suggestions? Regards, Jim |
Hans M. Knoll ![]()
Editor
D Articles: 2138 Schem.: 159 Pict.: 102 09.Jul.09 23:23 Count of Thanks: 5 |
Reply | You aren't logged in. (Guest) 12
Hello Jim.
Everything it is possible how I mean.
If the oscillator does not oscillate on 100Mhz, the conductance of Tube is 5 to 6 times larger and the tube see here on page 4
The additional condenser parallel to the 130pF, stops Regeneration on 10.7 Mhz.
Now, one off the Ceramics around the Mixer-Osc. Tube is wrong. I can not see who !
I don’t now, if you can read german. There was the same problem.
This engineers well informed, have no solutions for here Problem.
Tomorrow I can give you a paper on Rmorg. What ceramics take part.
My job was to show that local-osc. ist out of function!
That’s all I can do for you
Hans
This article was edited 10.Jul.09 09:48 by Wolfgang Bauer . |
James MacWilliams Schem.: 0 Pict.: 8 10.Jul.09 09:41 Count of Thanks: 6 |
Reply | You aren't logged in. (Guest) 13
Hans, I appreciate all the help you have given. I will also check the sources you supplied. Many thanks. Jim |
James MacWilliams Schem.: 0 Pict.: 8 10.Jul.09 10:56 Count of Thanks: 7 |
Reply | You aren't logged in. (Guest) 14
Hans, I suspect the 11 MHz oscillation may be due to the oscilloscope (O-scope) probe. I put the assembly back in the box for proper shielding. I also mounted the box back on the chassis to provide a proper ground (earth). I connected HT and 6.3 vac. I then measured the voltage at the test point through a 100K ohm resistor using a DC voltmeter (per other thread). I measured -2.95 vdc. Still using the 100K resistor, I measure the same with the O-scope with no oscillation. But without the 100K resistor and probe directly on the test point, it oscillates at 11 MHz. Still, I do not see any oscillations on this test point in the 100 MHz range. I am tempted to re-connect all wires to see if anything has changed. Regards, Jim |
Hans M. Knoll ![]()
Editor
D Articles: 2138 Schem.: 159 Pict.: 102 10.Jul.09 11:35 Count of Thanks: 6 |
Reply | You aren't logged in. (Guest) 15
Hello Jim. As an installation you can find a picture with components. What i think is: the Diode ist wrong! O.K. you think no!
EDIT: More. Uses Portable radio, tune the VHF box on lower end (88 Mcs) Bring the rod antenna of the portable near to the ECC85 bulb and search at 88 + 10,7= 98,7 for a strong carrier. If an local VHF Carrier is busy there. Move the Box a little bit higher. Switch the VHF- Box off and on to test what Carrier you receive. Booth, that and use off VTM and 1 Meg. i have recommendet long bevor.( post 7, above) I am sorry, english ist not my language! I wish you a lot of success . Hans This article was edited 10.Jul.09 12:16 by Hans M. Knoll . |
James MacWilliams Schem.: 0 Pict.: 8 15.Jul.09 13:19 Count of Thanks: 6 |
Reply | You aren't logged in. (Guest) 16
Hans, I have determined the faulty component, C616 - 130 pF capacitor. I did a number of things to simplify the circuit.
I still have to undo the other modifications I did, but I feel certain it will continue to work. Thanks for all of your suggestions, you have been most helpful, and I would not have gotten there without your assistance. Regards, Jim |