Capehart Turn-over Record Changer 41-E
Farnsworth Television & Radio Corp. - see also Capehart
- Country
- United States of America (USA)
- Manufacturer / Brand
- Farnsworth Television & Radio Corp. - see also Capehart
- Year
- 1945–1949
- Category
- Sound/Video Recorder and/or Player
- Radiomuseum.org ID
- 40040
Click on the schematic thumbnail to request the schematic as a free document.
- Wave bands
- - without
- Details
- Record-Changer, both sides!
- Power type and voltage
- Alternating Current supply (AC) / 117 Volt
- Loudspeaker
- - For headphones or amp.
- Material
- Metal case
- from Radiomuseum.org
- Model: Capehart Turn-over Record Changer 41-E - Farnsworth Television & Radio
- Shape
- Chassis only or for «building in»
- Notes
-
Capehart 41-E is the turning changer only from after the war.
See here the "Common information for the Capehart model pages for the 1930s and 1940s".
- External source of data
- Ernst Erb
- Circuit diagram reference
- Rider's Perpetual, Volume 20 covering 1950
- Other Models
-
Here you find 400 models, 284 with images and 327 with schematics for wireless sets etc. In French: TSF for Télégraphie sans fil.
All listed radios etc. from Farnsworth Television & Radio Corp. - see also Capehart
Forum contributions about this model: Farnsworth: Capehart Turn-over Record Changer 41-E
Threads: 1 | Posts: 1
We received the following comment from Robert Mersey (guest);
Just a note to say that you have your information wrong on the 1948 ,
1949 Capehart 41-E changers,,, they didn't use crystal pick-ups, they
used GE magnetic cartridges on all 41-E units..
Bob
I asked him to provide more detail and received the following response:
Hi Dave, one place I found that information is in Bob Baumbachs' book where he has a "Capehart Hardware Chart", (sorry no page number). At the bottom of the page where it shows the 1946-1947 on 1949 41-E changers. It states that the curved arm changers used Crystal pick-ups. Also, Ernst Erb had a page from somewhere, maybe "Riders", where he copied the chart .That is where I originally found the incorrect info.
regards, Bob
David Erali, 27.Aug.18